I really liked reading Denison’s “The Way We Ran: Reimagining Research and the Self” this week. Denison emphasizes the importance of personal narratives and stories within academia; he argued that “performative writing, which demands writers to consider a range of critical perspectives, infuses our work with tremendous transformational and transgressive potential” (2006, p. 339). Denison underlines that we need “stories, therefore, where the outcome … offers the possibility of change” (2006, p. 338). I think that performative writing is especially beneficial for athletes (and individuals in general) belonging to minority groups, for it is a sufficient way to create understanding rather than knowledge about that group. While most athletes are under a certain amount of pressure to succeed, minorities often have to deal with immense societal pressure placed on them as well. Through performative writing (“stories”), minorities have the potential to give insight into their lives, thus signifying change and progress to the masses.
What I found also
interesting about Denison’s essay is his argument that who we are - our
identity - shapes our research and scholarly activities. He writes about
himself:
I once was a runner, but now I am an academic
who writes about running. And to an extent, the way that I write does speak
volumes about the kind of runner I was, that is, careful, critical, observant,
… . I performed running, too – the race as art, movement as expression – just
like I try to write in ways that perform culture. Feel, rhythm, and pacing were
as important to me as speed and results. (2006, p. 334)
Just like Denison’s
scholarly identity is reflected in his athletic identity (and vice versa, as
can be seen in the passage above), I think that some of the characteristics of
my athletic life (even though it is rather for recreational than competitive
purposes) shape my identity as a scholar and academic. Like my academic work,
recreational bodybuilding requires me to be very organized and disciplined. In
order to see satisfactory results, I need to not only plan each workout in
detail (What muscle group do I work on, with what workouts, on what day of the
week, in what order? When do I do cardio, for how long, in what intensity, what
time of the day?), I also have to keep track of the weights I use and the
repetitions I do for each workout. Just like with the process of writing
an academic essay, I need to be accurate and thorough in how I carry out my
workouts.
I think Denison makes a
very strong point here, and I agree with him that the characteristics,
behaviors, and attitudes that shape who we are in sports, also interact with
and underline who we are outside of sports. What do you think? How does your
participation in sports reflect yourself as a person, and vice versa? How are
your behavior patterns as a scholar, or in your job, based on the sport you
play?
Yannick,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in saying that there is or should be a relationship between how we structure our lives in sport and how we approach our writing. I think if more student-athletes did this, we would see tremendous outputs in writing and academia. Likewise if we practiced our sports like we do our written or academic work, our athletic lives would be very different. What if I pulled an all-nighter to practice my serve? Not only would my arm be sore the next day but I probably wouldn't have the endurance or concentration needed to perform to my maximum potential. Then how do we obtain this transfer of skills from athletics to writing? I like the questions you posed to students who will be posting comments.
Dr. Spencer
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYannick,
ReplyDeleteI, too, believe that my athletic identity plays a major role in my academics. Similar to athletics, I am extremely dedicated to my studies/research, and strive to succeed. I dwell on poor outcomes in terms of achievement if I put forth a tremendous amount of effort, and thrive off of positive ones.
Success in research is similar to wins and losses in athletics. For example, if I find a research article supporting what I’m proposing, it is as if I have a team rallying behind me. On the contrary, if I struggle with finding supporting scholarly work, it is as I am a “one (wo)man team” with no teammates to help me succeed while putting forth my best effort.
I may have taken a different spin on my reflection of athletic identity and its influence on my scholarly identity, because the structure to my research is in need of some work. Despite how structured I was in my athletic career between workouts, practices, and matches, it unfortunately did not carry over
Yannick,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog on Dennison's article. I am for the first time exposed to evocative writing in scholarly/research articles. I feel like the whole new world is open to me because I am now considering taking a qualitative research class and doing my project or thesis in the field of sport sociology.
Denison states that "Good writing like good running has to meet certain standards." (2006, p. 334). I totally agree with his statement and that is one of the main reasons why it takes me a long time to write. I have high standards for myself as a coach, I have high standards for my players and I have high standards for my writing. In addition, writing in English, which is not my native language, makes those standards even harder to meet sometimes.
I like the questions that you posed in your blog. I think that the characteristics, behaviors, and attitudes that shape who we are outside of the sport transfer to the athletic arena. "Sports do not build character. They reveal it,” said sportswriter Heywood Hale Broun. John Wooden declared that sports are where one’s true personality comes out. Sports strip away the facade and show what is real in and about us.
Yannick,
ReplyDeleteI can relate with the author, and yourself, in the way that my approach to sports that I played growing up affects my writing. However, I am a bit different than you and the author; I tend to lay down a good foundation for my writing and then work quickly and somewhat erratically to fill each part of the outline. Little bits of information that pertain to what I am currently writing will be put down in the part of the outline that I believe fits, but I may not actually write that section until the very end.
In my sports, I was generally one of the fastest players on the team. I prided myself on defense in the team sports that I was involved in, and I played a very aggressive game in both soccer and defense. I was constantly pressing opposing players, never letting them control the pace of the game. I may have gotten beat on an initial move, but I would almost always recover quickly and reposition myself. I believe this, in a way, fits right with my style of writing.
So, after reading the article and your post I was able to analyze my own situation and realize I also fall along these lines. Good post, it definitely made me think differently!
Joey